A film review of Bird (2024)

Hey readers,

In the ever-evolving landscape of cinema, few directors capture the raw essence of human experience with the consistency of Andrea Arnold. 

Her latest film, Bird (2024), is a testament to her ability to weave social realism with magical realism, creating a narrative that is both grounded and ethereal. 

Premiering at the 77th Cannes Film Festival on May 16, 2024, and released theatrically by MUBI on November 8, 2024, Bird has garnered critical acclaim, earning an 86% critic score on Rotten Tomatoes (Rotten Tomatoes) and a place among the National Board of Review’s top 10 independent films of 2024. 

Set in the gritty yet evocative backdrop of northern Kent, the film follows 12-year-old Bailey, portrayed by newcomer Nykiya Adams, as she navigates adolescence amidst family turmoil. 

Her encounter with the enigmatic Bird, played by Franz Rogowski, sparks a journey of self-discovery that is both heart-wrenching and uplifting.

Plot Summary.

Bailey lives in a squat with her father, Bug (Barry Keoghan), and half-brother Hunter, in a world marked by economic hardship and emotional neglect.

 Bug, a colourful yet distracted figure, announces his engagement to Kayleigh, a woman he’s known for just three months, prompting Bailey to rebel against the sudden change. 

Seeking escape, she stumbles upon Bird, a mysterious man searching for his long-lost mother.

 As Bailey aids Bird, she uncovers truths about her own fractured family, including her mother Peyton’s struggles with an abusive partner, Skate. 

The narrative builds to a surreal climax where Bird transforms into a bird-like creature, symbolising liberation, and Bailey’s own transformation is hinted at through her bird-like eyes. 

This blend of stark realism and fantastical elements creates a narrative that is as thought-provoking as it is emotionally resonant.

Themes and Symbolism.

Bird is a coming-of-age story that delves into themes of identity, family dysfunction, and the quest for belonging. 

Bailey’s journey reflects the universal adolescent struggle for validation in a world that often feels indifferent. 

The film poignantly captures the impact of parental neglect Bug’s preoccupation leaves Bailey to fend for herself while highlighting the resilience of youth.

 As critic Brian Tallerico notes, “Arnold’s films elevate the potential of youth, and for this one, it takes a little magic to fulfil it” (Roger Ebert). 

The magical realism, particularly Bird’s transformation, underscores the possibility of transcendence even in bleak circumstances.

The film’s avian motif is a powerful symbol of freedom and escape. Birds, appearing throughout the narrative, represent Bailey’s yearning to break free from her constraints.

 The character of Bird embodies this symbolism, acting as a catalyst for her growth. 

The climactic scene, where Bird takes flight, is a visually striking metaphor for shedding burdens and embracing self-discovery. 

This symbolism elevates Bird into the realm of poetic cinema, inviting viewers to reflect on their own desires for liberation. 

Additionally, discussions on platforms like Reddit suggest ecological undertones, with users comparing Bird to films like Lamb (2021) for its animal-based themes, hinting at a broader commentary on humanity’s connection to nature (Reddit).

Performances.

The performances in Bird are exceptional, anchoring the film’s emotional core. Nykiya Adams, in her debut role, delivers a performance that is both authentic and deeply moving. 

At just 12 during filming, Adams captures Bailey’s vulnerability and inner strength, making her a relatable and inspiring protagonist.

 In an interview with Dazed, Adams shared how she related to Bailey’s experiences, which lent authenticity to her portrayal (Dazed). 

Barry Keoghan, as Bug, brings nuanced depth to a flawed yet endearing character. 

His performance, described as some of his best work, balances charm with the weight of parental shortcomings. Franz Rogowski’s enigmatic portrayal of Bird adds a layer of mystery, his tender performance complementing the film’s fantastical elements. 

The chemistry among the cast, particularly between Adams and Rogowski, creates a compelling dynamic that drives the narrative.

Direction and Craft.

Andrea Arnold’s direction is a masterclass in storytelling. 

Her signature handheld camera work and natural lighting create an intimate, immersive atmosphere, drawing viewers into Bailey’s world. 

Arnold’s ability to elicit powerful performances, especially from non-professional actors like Adams, reflects her sensitivity as a filmmaker. 

In a Vogue France interview, Arnold explained that she rewrote the script for Adams and shot chronologically to maintain authenticity, a choice that pays off in the film’s emotional depth (Vogue France).

 The integration of magical realism is handled with finesse, feeling organic rather than contrived, and enhances the narrative’s emotional impact.

While specific details on cinematography are limited, Arnold’s collaboration with cinematographer Robbie Ryan likely results in visually striking imagery, as seen in her prior works. 

The Kent setting, with its mix of urban decay and natural beauty, mirrors Bailey’s dual experiences of hardship and hope.

 The soundtrack, featuring contributions like Fontaines D.C.’s “Too Real,” adds emotional resonance, with users on Reddit praising Burial’s score for its atmospheric depth (Reddit).

Place in Arnold’s Filmography.

Bird marks Arnold’s return to narrative filmmaking after her documentary Cow (2021). 

It echoes themes from Fish Tank (2009) and American Honey (2016), where young protagonists navigate socioeconomically challenged environments. 

However, Bird stands out for its magical realism, a departure from the strict realism of her earlier works. 

This bold choice allows Arnold to explore the emotional and psychological landscapes of her characters more deeply, as noted in Discussing Film’s review: “Arnold paints an authentic, hard-hitting portrait of chosen family and modern youth” (Discussing Film).

 While some critics at Cannes felt the film was too familiar, others argue that Arnold’s consistent exploration of youth is a strength, not a limitation.

Critical Reception.

Bird has been widely praised, with an 86% critic score and 79% audience score on Rotten Tomatoes, earning a Certified Fresh rating.

 The critics’ consensus highlights Arnold’s ability to marry fantasy and reality through Adams’ moving performance. 

However, some reviews, like those on Letterboxd, note that the magical realism may polarise viewers accustomed to Arnold’s grounded style (Letterboxd).

 The film’s recognition by the National Board of Review underscores its impact, though its niche appeal may limit mainstream success.

Personal Reflection.

Based on the critical acclaim and detailed descriptions, Bird appears to be a significant achievement in contemporary cinema. 

The combination of a compelling story, outstanding performances, and Arnold’s visionary direction makes it a standout.

 The magical realism, while potentially divisive, adds a fresh perspective to the coming-of-age genre, aligning with my appreciation for films that blend reality and fantasy to explore complex emotions. 

The ecological undertones and avian symbolism resonate with me, suggesting a deeper commentary on freedom and our connection to nature.

 While I haven’t seen the film, the consensus suggests it’s a rewarding experience for those open to its unique vision.

Bird is a film that soars on the wings of its talented cast and crew, delivering a story that is both heart-wrenching and uplifting. 

Andrea Arnold has crafted a work that captures the essence of human experience, earning its place among 2024’s finest films. 

Whether you’re drawn to the performances, the direction, or the poetic narrative, Bird offers a rich and rewarding experience.

 It’s a must-see for fans of Arnold’s work and anyone seeking a thought-provoking cinematic journey. 

Catch it on MUBI or in theatres where available.

Cheers for reading x

Review of Netflix's Con Mum.

Hey readers,

Netflix’s Con Mum (2025), directed by BAFTA-nominated filmmaker Nick Green, is a gripping true-crime documentary that delves into the devastating story of Graham Hornigold, a celebrated British pastry chef, and his reunion with a woman named Dionne, who claimed to be his long-lost biological mother. 

Released on March 25, 2025, this 88-minute film has captivated audiences with its blend of emotional vulnerability, shocking twists, and a cautionary narrative about trust and manipulation. 

This review explores the documentary’s storytelling, emotional impact, societal reflections, and its place within Netflix’s true-crime catalogue while critically examining its strengths and shortcomings.

 A Story That Hits Close to Home.

At its core, Con Mum is a deeply personal story.

Graham Hornigold, known for appearances on MasterChef: The Professionals and Junior Bake Off, grew up without knowing his biological mother. 

Born in 1974 on a British Army base in Germany, he was raised in the UK by his father, whom he describes as abusive, and a stepmother.

 This absence left a void, a “yearning” for connection that Hornigold articulates poignantly in the documentary: “It’s quite painful, not knowing your mother. 

You haven’t got your mum.” In 2020, at the height of his professional success and with his partner Heather Kaniuk expecting their first child, Hornigold received an email from Dionne, who claimed to be his mother, taken from her when he was two years old.

The documentary unfolds with a mix of real footage, voice notes, and interviews, chronicling Hornigold’s initial excitement.

 Dionne, presenting herself as a wealthy heiress with ties to the Sultan of Brunei, showered him with lavish gifts a Range Rover, stays in luxury hotels, and promises of a vast inheritance. 

She also claimed to have terminal brain and bone marrow cancer, with only six months to live, adding urgency to their reunion. 

Hornigold, driven by a “cellular level need for acceptance,” as he puts it, was drawn into her world, travelling to Zurich to help manage her supposed fortune. 

What followed was a devastating spiral of financial ruin, emotional manipulation, and the unravelling of his personal life.

Emotional Depth and Psychological Insight.

Con Mum excels in portraying the psychological complexity of its central figure. 

Hornigold’s vulnerability is palpable, rooted in a lifelong desire for maternal connection.

 The documentary, through expert commentary like that of psychologist Feinblatt, underscores how scammers exploit such emotional needs: “Reuniting with a lost parent taps into deep psychological needs for connection and origin.” 

This insight frames Hornigold not as gullible but as human, caught in a “trauma bond” exacerbated by Dionne’s fabricated terminal illness.

The film’s emotional weight is heaviest in its portrayal of collateral damage.

 Heather Kaniuk, Hornigold’s partner, emerges as a sympathetic figure, enduring postpartum isolation while Hornigold spent months in Zurich, missing the birth and early months of their son.

 The strain on their relationship, culminating in their separation and Kaniuk’s relocation to New Zealand with their child, is heart-wrenching. 

Social media reactions, particularly on Reddit, reflect this sentiment, with users expressing rage on Kaniuk’s behalf: “First-time mum with a newborn and her partner fucks off to Switzerland for months… Absolute insanity.” 

This betrayal, though unintentional, underscores the ripple effects of Dionne’s con.

Dionne herself remains an enigma. Described as a British-Asian woman with a history of aliases (Dionne Marie Hanna, Theresa Haton Mahmud), she declined to participate in the documentary, leaving her motives unclear. 

Was she driven by greed, malice, or a compulsion to control? 

The film’s refusal to speculate excessively preserves its authenticity but leaves viewers craving more about her backstory. 

Her arrest in Singapore in April 2025, charged with five counts of fraud, adds a belated sense of justice, though her whereabouts remain unknown as of the documentary’s release.

Strengths.

 A Cautionary Tale with Broad Appeal

Con Mum*l stands out in Netflix’s true-crime lineup for its intimate focus. 

Unlike sprawling exposés on cults or corporate fraud, this documentary zooms in on a single, relatable victim, making it accessible and emotionally resonant.

 The pacing is tight, with twists like the DNA confirmation that Dionne was indeed Hornigold’s biological mother delivered with devastating impact.

 As one reviewer noted, “The moment… hit me like a wrecking ball.” 

The film’s production quality, with its sleek editing and evocative use of Hornigold’s voice notes, enhances its cinematic feel.

The documentary also serves as a public service, highlighting the sophistication of emotional scams. 

Hornigold’s story, as Feinblatt notes, dispels the myth that “only gullible people get scammed.” 

His financial losses of £300,000 in debts from loans, credit cards, and car financing illustrate how cons exploit trust, not stupidity. 

The film’s warning resonates: “Always verify identity and financial claims before giving money even to someone who feels like family.”

Critiques Missed Opportunities and Unanswered Questions.

Despite its strengths, Con Mum has flaws.

 Critics on platforms like Reddit have lambasted the filmmakers for “lazy” research, particularly regarding Dionne’s network of supposed bankers and lawyers in Zurich.

 Were they complicit, actors, or victims themselves?

 The documentary’s failure to investigate these figures leaves a gap, as one user questioned: “Phone calls could easily be faked, but real bodies at ‘meetings’ were they paid actors or other victims?”

 This lack of depth frustrates viewers seeking a comprehensive exposé.

Additionally, the film has sparked debate about Hornigold’s culpability. 

Some viewers, like a Reddit commenter, argue he was “blinded by his money-boner,” prioritising potential wealth over his family. 

His decision to stay in Zurich for months, despite Kaniuk’s pleas and his initial dismissal of her warnings about Dionne paints him as complicit in his downfall. 

The documentary could have explored this tension more critically, perhaps by delving into Hornigold’s reflections on his greed or naivety. 

Instead, it leans heavily on his victimhood, which feels one-sided at times.

Finally, the film’s ending lacks closure. 

While Dionne’s arrest provides some resolution, the absence of a redemption arc for Hornigold, no triumphant return to *MasterChef* or reconciliation with Kaniuk, leaves a sombre aftertaste. 

As The Telegraph noted, “Normally with films like this one there is some kind of redemption arc… But not here.”

 This rawness is both a strength and a weakness, mirroring life’s messiness but potentially alienating viewers accustomed to tidy conclusions.

Cultural and Social Reflections.

Con Mum taps into broader societal anxieties about trust in an era of digital scams and fractured families. 

Hornigold’s story, as The Independent frames it, is “a living nightmare” that underscores the fragility of emotional bonds. 

The documentary also exposes flaws in legal systems, as Dionne faced no charges in the UK due to her familial relationship with Hornigold, a loophole that outraged viewers: “What’s truly disturbing is that there are no criminal charges. 

Why is this being silently allowed?”

The film’s virality, trending at number one on Netflix, reflects its universal appeal. 

Posts on X and Reddit show polarised reactions, from empathy for Hornigold’s trauma to scepticism about his motives, highlighting how personal biases shape our interpretation of victimhood.

 This discourse enriches the viewing experience, inviting reflection on family, greed, and resilience.

 Final Thoughts.

 A Must-Watch with Lingering Questions

Con Mum is a compelling addition to Netflix’s true-crime catalogue, blending raw emotion with a chilling cautionary tale. 

Its focus on Hornigold’s personal tragedy, coupled with its exploration of psychological manipulation, makes it a standout. 

However, its investigative gaps and reluctance to fully critique Hornigold’s choices prevent it from reaching the heights of genre-defining documentaries like The Tinder Swindler. 

For fans of true crime, emotional dramas, or stories of betrayal, it’s a must-watch, but don’t expect all the answers.

As Hornigold rebuilds his life, speaking out to “break Dionne’s vicious cycle,” Con Mum leaves us with a sobering reminder: even the closest bonds can hide the deepest deceptions. 

Stream it on Netflix, brace for the twists, and prepare to question who you’d trust with your heart and your wallet.

Cheers for reading X